User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27343779-20160109192541/@comment-27343779-20160109215616: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-27343779-20160109192541/@comment-27343779-20160109215616'''
In a nutshell, that's what i'm thinking too.
In a nutshell, that's what i'm thinking too.
Now we need someone with the administrative rights to recreate the Trial of Davros page which currently has a lock preventing common contributors from doing so, this delete lock was put because the administrator thought that all performances were unlicensed.
Now we need someone with the administrative rights to recreate the Trial of Davros page which currently has a lock preventing common contributors from doing so, this delete lock was put because the administrator thought that all performances were unlicensed.
Line 10: Line 9:


Could we add it as a valid source of this wiki or is it also too uncertain? (maybe i should make another topic for this matter)
Could we add it as a valid source of this wiki or is it also too uncertain? (maybe i should make another topic for this matter)
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20160109192541-27343779/20160109215616-27343779]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
231,245

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.