User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-6032121-20191013225604: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-31010985-20190928203157/@comment-6032121-20191013225604'''
[[User:Amorkuz]]:
[[User:Amorkuz]]:


Line 5: Line 4:


Once more, I apologize for answering arguments that are not yours, but ''would you kindly tell us what your actual argument is'', rather than leave us to make guesses and then correct us when they miss the mark? If not to push an argument based on the "anything published personally on the Internet is fanfic" idea, ''why is the self-published nature of the short stories relevant''? What are you arguing ''for''? A debate cannot be had with anything resembling efficiency if one of the parties just gives examples but refuses to explain what point they're meant to be illustrating.
Once more, I apologize for answering arguments that are not yours, but ''would you kindly tell us what your actual argument is'', rather than leave us to make guesses and then correct us when they miss the mark? If not to push an argument based on the "anything published personally on the Internet is fanfic" idea, ''why is the self-published nature of the short stories relevant''? What are you arguing ''for''? A debate cannot be had with anything resembling efficiency if one of the parties just gives examples but refuses to explain what point they're meant to be illustrating.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20190928203157-31010985/20191013225604-6032121]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
229,566

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.