User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-26975268-20130515221906: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-26975268-20130515221906'''
Actually, I'm beginning to see what you're saying, Czech. Since almost ''everything'' contradicts, we'd pretty much be treating the adaptations as notDWU anyway.
Actually, I'm beginning to see what you're saying, Czech. Since almost ''everything'' contradicts, we'd pretty much be treating the adaptations as notDWU anyway.


I still hold, however, that maybe we should allow things that don't contradict to be valid, so that we can have a hypothetical page on the [[contrafibularity flu]]. If we don't cover both, then we'll be dismissing a potentially good page.
I still hold, however, that maybe we should allow things that don't contradict to be valid, so that we can have a hypothetical page on the [[contrafibularity flu]]. If we don't cover both, then we'll be dismissing a potentially good page.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20130510140359-37.225.52.51/20130515221906-26975268]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
231,276

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.