User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1432718-20171119042822: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1432718-20171119042822'''
Given that any "story" that doesn't have a consistent narrative among all users is considered '''not valid''', it seems to me the easiest solution at this point is to make each video game '''not valid''', and individual cases for inclusion could be argued at [[Board:Inclusion debates]].
Given that any "story" that doesn't have a consistent narrative among all users is considered '''not valid''', it seems to me the easiest solution at this point is to make each video game '''not valid''', and individual cases for inclusion could be argued at [[Board:Inclusion debates]].
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171119042822-1432718]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
231,245

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.