User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4028641-20180116092358: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4028641-20180116092358'''
Frankly Shambala108, under the current conditions and standards of the inclusion debates I have to refuse your compromise. We haven't seen a thread closed in favour of validity in a very long time, (I believe the last case was the ''Dr. Men'' series) and any forum that moves even a step closer towards changing policy is left to rot. I'm not criticising past closings by any means, but until I see even a ''hint'' that a story being turned from ''invalid'' to ''valid'' is realistic with our current system I will not, by any means, support a "temporary" ''purge'' of content.
Frankly Shambala108, under the current conditions and standards of the inclusion debates I have to refuse your compromise. We haven't seen a thread closed in favour of validity in a very long time, (I believe the last case was the ''Dr. Men'' series) and any forum that moves even a step closer towards changing policy is left to rot. I'm not criticising past closings by any means, but until I see even a ''hint'' that a story being turned from ''invalid'' to ''valid'' is realistic with our current system I will not, by any means, support a "temporary" ''purge'' of content.


Declaring that all videos games must now be invalid to be litigated over later is sentencing them to a slow, painful death.
Declaring that all videos games must now be invalid to be litigated over later is sentencing them to a slow, painful death.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20180116092358-4028641]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
231,245

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.