229,659
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4189499-20171120092754: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4189499-20171120092754 (edit)
Revision as of 14:40, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Really, the how is the least important factor for the story. You can tell the narrative without saying who struck the final blow. I mean, honestly, "The monster got defeated when the dots lined up in a T formation" makes no sense, and doesn't make sense within the story either. The gameplay is certainly meta to the narrative. Therefore, the narrative can be told without the gameplay. | Really, the how is the least important factor for the story. You can tell the narrative without saying who struck the final blow. I mean, honestly, "The monster got defeated when the dots lined up in a T formation" makes no sense, and doesn't make sense within the story either. The gameplay is certainly meta to the narrative. Therefore, the narrative can be told without the gameplay. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151007072528-4028641/20171120092754-4189499]]</noinclude> | ||
