231,276
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151113035350: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151113035350 (edit)
Revision as of 14:40, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5/-, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|Inclusion debates/Devious}} | |||
This is a bit of an odd one for the forum, as I am not going to be arguing if the fan film ''Devious'' is a valid source or not. I am instead going to be questioning which version of the film we should cover. We currently write the article as if we are covering the entire film, even though it is not completed and this is thus against our spoiler policy. More importantly tho, the entire film is not sanctioned by the BBC and thus should not be covered by us -- even if it is released to the public. Instead we should cover the DVD mini-feature version which was released by the BBC and is a complete narrative. I have restructured the article to be more prone to our standards and this idea. | This is a bit of an odd one for the forum, as I am not going to be arguing if the fan film ''Devious'' is a valid source or not. I am instead going to be questioning which version of the film we should cover. We currently write the article as if we are covering the entire film, even though it is not completed and this is thus against our spoiler policy. More importantly tho, the entire film is not sanctioned by the BBC and thus should not be covered by us -- even if it is released to the public. Instead we should cover the DVD mini-feature version which was released by the BBC and is a complete narrative. I have restructured the article to be more prone to our standards and this idea. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151113035350-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
