User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151113035350/@comment-4028641-20151113114818: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151113035350/@comment-4028641-20151113114818'''
Well the main issue with ''Shada'' is that the linking narration is Tom Baker doing it as Tom Baker. Devious' recap doesn't break the fourth wall. Another main difference is that while the TV story and the Homevideo Shada are both sanctioned by the BBC, the bonus feature is the only version that we will ever write a page on or should. If the fan film is completed and released on Youtube tomorrow, we still should only write about the BBC-approved ''currently completed'' bonus feature.
Well the main issue with ''Shada'' is that the linking narration is Tom Baker doing it as Tom Baker. Devious' recap doesn't break the fourth wall. Another main difference is that while the TV story and the Homevideo Shada are both sanctioned by the BBC, the bonus feature is the only version that we will ever write a page on or should. If the fan film is completed and released on Youtube tomorrow, we still should only write about the BBC-approved ''currently completed'' bonus feature.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20151113035350-4028641/20151113114818-4028641]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
231,276

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.