229,566
edits
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I will '''''never''''' stop bring up Lego Dimensions because, for the billionth time, it being invalid doesn't meant that it doesn't exist. We ''do not'' need to prove from an in-universe perspective that that the Daleks aren't from a universe where they're a toy. All that we need to prove is the ''authorial context'' for why they included the Daleks and their logic. | I will '''''never''''' stop bring up Lego Dimensions because, for the billionth time, it being invalid doesn't meant that it doesn't exist. We ''do not'' need to prove from an in-universe perspective that that the Daleks aren't from a universe where they're a toy. All that we need to prove is the ''authorial context'' for why they included the Daleks and their logic. | ||
Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
If that is the ''context'' is that they wrote the Daleks into the film knowing that they were from the DWU in ''Lego Dimensions,'' then we can accept that as the authorial intent. | If that is the ''context'' is that they wrote the Daleks into the film knowing that they were from the DWU in ''Lego Dimensions,'' then we can accept that as the authorial intent. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170222073756-4028641/20170225214020-4028641]]</noinclude> |