User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170306172600/@comment-4028641-20190914230346: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170306172600/@comment-4028641-20190914230346'''
I'm looking at this thread again, two and a half years after it started, and I'm trying to think of a new witty argument to make. I'm scouring my head for all the strange corners of this site and this franchise for parallels to bring up. And I'm at sort of a loss?
I'm looking at this thread again, two and a half years after it started, and I'm trying to think of a new witty argument to make. I'm scouring my head for all the strange corners of this site and this franchise for parallels to bring up. And I'm at sort of a loss?


Line 5: Line 4:


Again, no offense, but at this stage the argument we seem to be facing is "There might be a nebulous, unwritten rule that these stories break." I don't really know how to respond to that?
Again, no offense, but at this stage the argument we seem to be facing is "There might be a nebulous, unwritten rule that these stories break." I don't really know how to respond to that?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170306172600-4028641/20190914230346-4028641]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
229,566

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.