229,566
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20180417160500: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20180417160500 (edit)
Revision as of 15:14, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|Inclusion debates/The Future Discussion about Alternate Doctor Who Universe Stories}} | |||
So a few weeks ago, I wrote and posted a forum on my views on the main issue with the site. I was then informed by our head admin that the parts of the post I had done in defining words like “canon,” “fictional universe,” and “valid” was problematic. He, however, did not disagree with the changes that I was suggesting and stated that he too was looking for reform. To make up for this, I have removed and altered pretty much all of what he brought up in his final point (which was not the "basis" of the forum really, it was just side-stuff), basically eliminating all of what was noted in the final post. As any points that were used to close the thread are now fixed, there should be no issue with reopening the discussion. Welcome to the “future discussion.” | So a few weeks ago, I wrote and posted a forum on my views on the main issue with the site. I was then informed by our head admin that the parts of the post I had done in defining words like “canon,” “fictional universe,” and “valid” was problematic. He, however, did not disagree with the changes that I was suggesting and stated that he too was looking for reform. To make up for this, I have removed and altered pretty much all of what he brought up in his final point (which was not the "basis" of the forum really, it was just side-stuff), basically eliminating all of what was noted in the final post. As any points that were used to close the thread are now fixed, there should be no issue with reopening the discussion. Welcome to the “future discussion.” | ||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
*All and any stories considered invalid for being connected to the above narratives. See: ''[[The Feast of the Stone (short story)|The Feast of the Stone]]'', ''[[Daleks Versus the Martians (comic story)|Daleks Versus the Martians]]'' | *All and any stories considered invalid for being connected to the above narratives. See: ''[[The Feast of the Stone (short story)|The Feast of the Stone]]'', ''[[Daleks Versus the Martians (comic story)|Daleks Versus the Martians]]'' | ||
Thank you for your consideration, apologies if I was a little to blunt in any key places. | Thank you for your consideration, apologies if I was a little to blunt in any key places. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20180417160500-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
