User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-6032121-20200606144239: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200606025128/@comment-6032121-20200606144239'''
But he ''did'' tease it during the Tweetalong! It was absolutely part of the same line of comment as his unveiling of three unproduced stories during #TruthOrConsequences. I'd see your point if he'd randomly started posting about dromedaries, or (to be less strawmanny) a completely new story about the Thirteenth Doctor fighting Davros. But this ''is'' closely related to the #TruthOrConsequences ''Lockdown!'' at the very ''least'', whether or not we should cover it in full.
But he ''did'' tease it during the Tweetalong! It was absolutely part of the same line of comment as his unveiling of three unproduced stories during #TruthOrConsequences. I'd see your point if he'd randomly started posting about dromedaries, or (to be less strawmanny) a completely new story about the Thirteenth Doctor fighting Davros. But this ''is'' closely related to the #TruthOrConsequences ''Lockdown!'' at the very ''least'', whether or not we should cover it in full.


Line 8: Line 7:
* assuming the above is granted, why shouldn't '''C''' have a page about it, albeit [[:Template:Invalid|invalid]] if you lot are going to insist that the novelisation project existed?
* assuming the above is granted, why shouldn't '''C''' have a page about it, albeit [[:Template:Invalid|invalid]] if you lot are going to insist that the novelisation project existed?
* what evidence is there that this is different from the other three times during the ''Lockdown!'' "era" that an along-tweeting creator published some text presented as though it was part of an unfinished project?
* what evidence is there that this is different from the other three times during the ''Lockdown!'' "era" that an along-tweeting creator published some text presented as though it was part of an unfinished project?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200606025128-45314928/20200606144239-6032121]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
231,276

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.