User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200707123828/@comment-39988495-20200707124121: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200707123828/@comment-39988495-20200707124121'''
I believe it was the fact that they were part of the 10,000 Dawns series, and DWU elements crossed over ''into'' these stories, rather than the other way around. (So as they weren't entirely 100% DWU stories, like you mentioned.)
I believe it was the fact that they were part of the 10,000 Dawns series, and DWU elements crossed over ''into'' these stories, rather than the other way around. (So as they weren't entirely 100% DWU stories, like you mentioned.)
I could be wrong though.
I could be wrong though.


However, these stories being invalid is something I'm entirely opposed to, especially the Iris Wildthyme story, which strikes me as completely odd as the only Iris Wildthyme stories that aren't acknowledged by the wiki are charity publications (another ''interesting'' topic to say the least), and IW stories that make use of unlicensed elements, ''A Lady Doctor?'' for example.
However, these stories being invalid is something I'm entirely opposed to, especially the Iris Wildthyme story, which strikes me as completely odd as the only Iris Wildthyme stories that aren't acknowledged by the wiki are charity publications (another ''interesting'' topic to say the least), and IW stories that make use of unlicensed elements, ''A Lady Doctor?'' for example.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200707123828-45314928/20200707124121-39988495]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
229,566

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.