229,566
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200707131140/@comment-39988495-20200707134559: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45314928-20200707131140/@comment-39988495-20200707134559 (edit)
Revision as of 15:19, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Understandable, but I believe an admin said it was easier to rule out charity publications altogether than go through them on a case by case basis, determining the legality of the stories. If you could provide evidence that [[Lance Parkin]] (and [[Paul Magrs]] in the case of the [[Iris Wildthyme]] story) and [[Kate Orman]] still have the rights to these stories, then ''technically'' they can be accepted as a valid source. | Understandable, but I believe an admin said it was easier to rule out charity publications altogether than go through them on a case by case basis, determining the legality of the stories. If you could provide evidence that [[Lance Parkin]] (and [[Paul Magrs]] in the case of the [[Iris Wildthyme]] story) and [[Kate Orman]] still have the rights to these stories, then ''technically'' they can be accepted as a valid source. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200707131140-45314928/20200707134559-39988495]]</noinclude> | ||
