229,659
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-6032121-20200510215106: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-6032121-20200510215106 (edit)
Revision as of 15:21, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not much of an inclusion debate if you ask me. A very occasional user (no offence), [[User:Epsilon the Eternal]], asked if this story was ''canon''. Just as I was explaining to Epsilon that we don't deal in canon around here, [[User:Xx-connor-xX]] weighed in under the impression that the story's ''validity'' was under question due to the title of the story being wedged into a shot rather than getting a swirly title card like we're used to for television (but ''[[Extremis (TV story)|Extremis]]'' and [[Doctor Who (TV story)|the TV Movie]] are also edited so that the narrative footage bleeds into, and out of, the opening credits!), and that the Osgoods sit down to watch what is clearly spelled out as an episode of ''[[Doctor Who (The Thief of Sherwood)|Doctor Who]]'' at the end — but the fact that I can link to an in-universe ''Doctor Who'' page sans <nowiki>{{invalid}}</nowiki> tag is all the proof you need that ''Doctor Who'' is well-established to exist within the Doctor's universe (or [[The Girl Who Loved Doctor Who (comic story)|multiverse]]). | Not much of an inclusion debate if you ask me. A very occasional user (no offence), [[User:Epsilon the Eternal]], asked if this story was ''canon''. Just as I was explaining to Epsilon that we don't deal in canon around here, [[User:Xx-connor-xX]] weighed in under the impression that the story's ''validity'' was under question due to the title of the story being wedged into a shot rather than getting a swirly title card like we're used to for television (but ''[[Extremis (TV story)|Extremis]]'' and [[Doctor Who (TV story)|the TV Movie]] are also edited so that the narrative footage bleeds into, and out of, the opening credits!), and that the Osgoods sit down to watch what is clearly spelled out as an episode of ''[[Doctor Who (The Thief of Sherwood)|Doctor Who]]'' at the end — but the fact that I can link to an in-universe ''Doctor Who'' page sans <nowiki>{{invalid}}</nowiki> tag is all the proof you need that ''Doctor Who'' is well-established to exist within the Doctor's universe (or [[The Girl Who Loved Doctor Who (comic story)|multiverse]]). | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Folks, ''[[The Terror of the Umpty Ums (short story)|The Terror of the Umpty Ums]]'' is valid. We can surely deal with this without worrying about our precious (nonexistent) canon like Mary Whitehouse clutching at her pearls, and I fully trust this community, including Connor and Epsilon, to recognize this. | Folks, ''[[The Terror of the Umpty Ums (short story)|The Terror of the Umpty Ums]]'' is valid. We can surely deal with this without worrying about our precious (nonexistent) canon like Mary Whitehouse clutching at her pearls, and I fully trust this community, including Connor and Epsilon, to recognize this. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20200510214412-45692830/20200510215106-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
