User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-57280-20170205011338: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-57280-20170205011338'''
{{retitle|Inclusion debates/BF Sherlock Holmes question}}
I'm aware having read the Valid Sources policy that the Big Finish Sherlock Holmes is currently not considered a valid source. I suspect that was written before the "Worlds of Big Finish" anthology and its crossover that included Bernice Summerfield, Graceless, etc. Just as there is one exception allowed for Dorian Gray, but the rest of the Big Finish series is off-limits, should the Big Finish Sherlock Holmes entry be updated to allow for the one Worlds of Big Finish storyline?  {{retitle|///BF Sherlock Holmes question}}
I'm aware having read the Valid Sources policy that the Big Finish Sherlock Holmes is currently not considered a valid source. I suspect that was written before the "Worlds of Big Finish" anthology and its crossover that included Bernice Summerfield, Graceless, etc. Just as there is one exception allowed for Dorian Gray, but the rest of the Big Finish series is off-limits, should the Big Finish Sherlock Holmes entry be updated to allow for the one Worlds of Big Finish storyline?   
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20170205011338-57280]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
229,566

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.