User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5791028-20150709160234/@comment-4028641-20151008210651: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5791028-20150709160234/@comment-4028641-20151008210651'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Danniesen wrote:
Danniesen wrote:
Line 6: Line 5:


I suppose it should be brought into consideration ''how'' we write the behind-the-scenes and the invalid pages if we make them. There are two kinds -- where we write it from an out-of-universe perspective about the story's character (ex. [[Gareth Jenkins]], [[Ozmo]]) or if we write it as if were a valid article but put the invalid tag on and explain why it is invalid in the "behind the scenes" section (ex. [[The Valeyard (He Jests at Scars...)]], [[Ninth Doctor (Scream of the Shalka)]], and most invalid character articles)
I suppose it should be brought into consideration ''how'' we write the behind-the-scenes and the invalid pages if we make them. There are two kinds -- where we write it from an out-of-universe perspective about the story's character (ex. [[Gareth Jenkins]], [[Ozmo]]) or if we write it as if were a valid article but put the invalid tag on and explain why it is invalid in the "behind the scenes" section (ex. [[The Valeyard (He Jests at Scars...)]], [[Ninth Doctor (Scream of the Shalka)]], and most invalid character articles)
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20150709160234-5791028/20151008210651-4028641]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
228,839

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.