222,530
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Spelling debates/@comment-24894325-20151219214614/@comment-24894325-20151220224701: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Spelling debates/@comment-24894325-20151219214614/@comment-24894325-20151220224701 (edit)
Revision as of 15:42, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Now I see what you meant earlier: you were bot-proofing. Then I completely agree: this one seems completely bot-proof. (To your list above I might add that the [[Eleventh Doctor]]'s various pieces of clothing is described as ''checkered'' several times on the page. | Now I see what you meant earlier: you were bot-proofing. Then I completely agree: this one seems completely bot-proof. (To your list above I might add that the [[Eleventh Doctor]]'s various pieces of clothing is described as ''checkered'' several times on the page. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
Both 2) and 3) are workable I believe. My preference is for 2). As precedent, I would cite the absence of periods after Dr despite the use of "Dr. Who" in the credits (see [[Tardis:Honourifics]]). From my point of view, chequers are an object from the real world that is not reimagined in DWU in any substantial way. Hence, there is no reason to afford it a special courtesy of adaptive spelling. | Both 2) and 3) are workable I believe. My preference is for 2). As precedent, I would cite the absence of periods after Dr despite the use of "Dr. Who" in the credits (see [[Tardis:Honourifics]]). From my point of view, chequers are an object from the real world that is not reimagined in DWU in any substantial way. Hence, there is no reason to afford it a special courtesy of adaptive spelling. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Spelling debates/20151219214614-24894325/20151220224701-24894325]]</noinclude> | ||
