229,659
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Tales from the Tardis/@comment-188432-20130325173913/@comment-188432-20130413214017: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Tales from the Tardis/@comment-188432-20130325173913/@comment-188432-20130413214017 (edit)
Revision as of 15:50, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That's illogical, SOTO. If it is ''intentionally vague'' and ''can'' be interpreted either way, then therefore there is ''at least'' a suggestion by the people behind it that it's not set in the DWU. | That's illogical, SOTO. If it is ''intentionally vague'' and ''can'' be interpreted either way, then therefore there is ''at least'' a suggestion by the people behind it that it's not set in the DWU. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
Conversely, if we banned it because Big Finish said it wasn't a ''Doctor Who'' spin-off, everyone in this thread could wrap their minds around that statement and know that it was a ''true'' statement. ''That'' rationale would at least be completely transparent and provable by showing legitimate quotes. | Conversely, if we banned it because Big Finish said it wasn't a ''Doctor Who'' spin-off, everyone in this thread could wrap their minds around that statement and know that it was a ''true'' statement. ''That'' rationale would at least be completely transparent and provable by showing legitimate quotes. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Tales from the Tardis/20130325173913-188432/20130413214017-188432]]</noinclude> | ||
