User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618/@comment-5918438-20160108063433: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1293767-20151029072618/@comment-5918438-20160108063433'''
Just to point out, one-episode [[production block]]s have historically only been seen with [[double banking]], associated with [[Doctor-lite]] episodes. The most recent Doctor-lite episode was ''[[Flatline (TV story)|Flatline]]''. So my (very educated) guess is that we're seeing some form of double banking here, too.
Just to point out, one-episode [[production block]]s have historically only been seen with [[double banking]], associated with [[Doctor-lite]] episodes. The most recent Doctor-lite episode was ''[[Flatline (TV story)|Flatline]]''. So my (very educated) guess is that we're seeing some form of double banking here, too.


Line 7: Line 6:


I'd really like some hard confirmation that this ''is'' double banking, though. Filming dates, perhaps?
I'd really like some hard confirmation that this ''is'' double banking, though. Filming dates, perhaps?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151029072618-1293767/20160108063433-5918438]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
231,276

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.