User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-188432-20121218173814: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20121202170842/@comment-188432-20121218173814'''
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
Rowan Earthwood wrote:
Rowan Earthwood wrote:
Line 11: Line 10:


For this reason, I do not support Rowan's proposal that the section be called "references and continuity", because — as is evidenced by the fact that our newest editors are constantly confused about what to put into "continuity" and what to put into "references" — people simply don't connect with those words.  We need something else entirely.
For this reason, I do not support Rowan's proposal that the section be called "references and continuity", because — as is evidenced by the fact that our newest editors are constantly confused about what to put into "continuity" and what to put into "references" — people simply don't connect with those words.  We need something else entirely.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20121202170842-1317169/20121218173814-188432]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
231,276

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.