User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20130429150943: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5/-, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1317169-20130429150943'''
{{retitle|The Panopticon/Non-canon appreanaces on list of appearances}}
Is there much point have an individual’s non-canon appearances in their list of appearances?  
Is there much point have an individual’s non-canon appearances in their list of appearances?  


Line 8: Line 8:
Surely, if they are non-canon, then they should not be included.  
Surely, if they are non-canon, then they should not be included.  


I propose we removed them from the list of appearances, so create a new section at the bottom of the pages to store this information.  {{retitle|///Non-canon appreanaces on list of appearances}}
I propose we removed them from the list of appearances, so create a new section at the bottom of the pages to store this information.   
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130429150943-1317169]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
229,566

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.