User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-15964625-20130821204117/@comment-15964625-20130905011659: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-15964625-20130821204117/@comment-15964625-20130905011659'''
Sorry about the vagueness. I was indeed referring to categories of stories as SOTO suggested.   
Sorry about the vagueness. I was indeed referring to categories of stories as SOTO suggested.   
    
    
I now understand that the same information can be easily gathered from the list of appearances pages, but I still don't understand why some characters still have story categories (eg. Irving Braxiatel audio stories). Why do Braxiatel, Romana, and K9 each have their own separate category for audio stories? What criteria are we using to determine who gets a category?
I now understand that the same information can be easily gathered from the list of appearances pages, but I still don't understand why some characters still have story categories (eg. Irving Braxiatel audio stories). Why do Braxiatel, Romana, and K9 each have their own separate category for audio stories? What criteria are we using to determine who gets a category?
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130821204117-15964625/20130905011659-15964625]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
228,854

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.