User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-55646-20130129161323: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-188432-20130129081336/@comment-55646-20130129161323'''
Shouldn't common sense prevail here?  We all know that the Claras are all the same person.  If, on the unlikely chance that the Claras are not the same person, or needed to be treated as incarnations much like the Time Lord known as the Doctor, they can be created later.  But as an information site, pretending something is unknown for the sake of some adherence to strict "facts" goes against the point of being a resource.
Shouldn't common sense prevail here?  We all know that the Claras are all the same person.  If, on the unlikely chance that the Claras are not the same person, or needed to be treated as incarnations much like the Time Lord known as the Doctor, they can be created later.  But as an information site, pretending something is unknown for the sake of some adherence to strict "facts" goes against the point of being a resource.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130129081336-188432/20130129161323-55646]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
229,566

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.