User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20151229103324/@comment-5918438-20151229124906: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-24894325-20151229103324/@comment-5918438-20151229124906'''
Also, if this were at all implemented, I think we ''would'' make it convention to create these redirects for every dabbed character who appears in more than one medium. Rules need to be clear. If we say dab the article with the story in which the character first appeared, and then create redirects with dabs for each first story in other media, then we still have a clear rule.
Also, if this were at all implemented, I think we ''would'' make it convention to create these redirects for every dabbed character who appears in more than one medium. Rules need to be clear. If we say dab the article with the story in which the character first appeared, and then create redirects with dabs for each first story in other media, then we still have a clear rule.


This is certainly an ''interesting'' new idea brought to the table. I can't say yet whether or not I support it.
This is certainly an ''interesting'' new idea brought to the table. I can't say yet whether or not I support it.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20151229103324-24894325/20151229124906-5918438]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
230,341

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.