User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25117610-20161123164500/@comment-26285319-20170104165517: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25117610-20161123164500/@comment-26285319-20170104165517'''
Yes I think that was the thread actually. It being open is then most likely the reason the UNIT prefixes haven't been changed.
Yes I think that was the thread actually. It being open is then most likely the reason the UNIT prefixes haven't been changed.


As these conversations have reached mostly identical points, would it be okay for an admin to archive the other, older thread? It really serves no purpose anymore due to all BF ranges except UNIT having their prefixes dropped anyway.
As these conversations have reached mostly identical points, would it be okay for an admin to archive the other, older thread? It really serves no purpose anymore due to all BF ranges except UNIT having their prefixes dropped anyway.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20161123164500-25117610/20170104165517-26285319]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
231,245

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.