231,276
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150822192856/@comment-5545417-20150902182439: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150822192856/@comment-5545417-20150902182439 (edit)
Revision as of 23:16, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In my opinion, we should have had all the narrative information (plot, references, continuity) on the main page ''[[Four Doctors (comic story)]]'' and the technical, "merchandising" details of the single issues in each issue page ([[FD 1]], [[FD 2]], etc.). | In my opinion, we should have had all the narrative information (plot, references, continuity) on the main page ''[[Four Doctors (comic story)]]'' and the technical, "merchandising" details of the single issues in each issue page ([[FD 1]], [[FD 2]], etc.). | ||
Instead, like we are doing, when we put a reference to the storyline, we link to an umbrella-page with no narrative information, nor clues in what issue that reference refers to. | Instead, like we are doing, when we put a reference to the storyline, we link to an umbrella-page with no narrative information, nor clues in what issue that reference refers to. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20150822192856-4028641/20150902182439-5545417]]</noinclude> | ||
