228,854
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150828141837/@comment-188432-20150829191549: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150828141837/@comment-188432-20150829191549 (edit)
Revision as of 23:16, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Our [[Tardis:category naming conventions|category naming conventions]] are supposed to stop us from going down these rabbit holes. Multi-doctor stories is a vague concept. Probably the best thing we could do to aid reader understanding would be to: | Our [[Tardis:category naming conventions|category naming conventions]] are supposed to stop us from going down these rabbit holes. Multi-doctor stories is a vague concept. Probably the best thing we could do to aid reader understanding would be to: | ||
* remove the category | * remove the category | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
We definitely shouldn't be using categories or list pages as a way to "validate" a story as a multi-Doctor story. | We definitely shouldn't be using categories or list pages as a way to "validate" a story as a multi-Doctor story. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20150828141837-4028641/20150829191549-188432]]</noinclude> | ||
