User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-43908-20150822141052: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-43908-20150822141052'''
This is still more speculation and inferring than actual content.  We simply don't have any in-universe information to suggest that the Landau and Brooks incarnations are meant to be the same character, and a lot of behind-the-scenes data declaring that they aren't.  The fact that they are both thought of as the third Romana by their respective creators in separate media ranges doesn't warrant merging the two distinctly-crafted and portrayed characters into one in this encyclopedia.
This is still more speculation and inferring than actual content.  We simply don't have any in-universe information to suggest that the Landau and Brooks incarnations are meant to be the same character, and a lot of behind-the-scenes data declaring that they aren't.  The fact that they are both thought of as the third Romana by their respective creators in separate media ranges doesn't warrant merging the two distinctly-crafted and portrayed characters into one in this encyclopedia.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20150311013943-43908/20150822141052-43908]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
229,566

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.