User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200610043202: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5/-, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200610043202'''
{{retitle|The Panopticon/How The Monk Got His Habit (rename)}}
[[How The Monk Got His Habit (short story)]] should be merged into [[How The Monk Got His Habit (novelisation)]], because no short story existed - just an extract of the unproduced novelisation.
[[How The Monk Got His Habit (short story)]] should be merged into [[How The Monk Got His Habit (novelisation)]], because no short story existed - just an extract of the unproduced novelisation.


Line 8: Line 8:
"The author's use (twice) of the word "discarded" simplifies things: we do not consider unpublished stories to be valid. None of the arguments for validity were able to get around this fact."  
"The author's use (twice) of the word "discarded" simplifies things: we do not consider unpublished stories to be valid. None of the arguments for validity were able to get around this fact."  


so i do not wish to see continued "'''''if''' we are to believe Harness''" when it has been ruled that we are to believe him. according to this site the novelisation existed, and according to Harness this was only an extract and not written as a short story.{{retitle|///How The Monk Got His Habit (rename)}}
so i do not wish to see continued "'''''if''' we are to believe Harness''" when it has been ruled that we are to believe him. according to this site the novelisation existed, and according to Harness this was only an extract and not written as a short story.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20200610043202-45314928]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
228,854

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.