User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-5442547-20130319195443/@comment-188432-20130401030922: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-5442547-20130319195443/@comment-188432-20130401030922'''
No rule is perfect.  But this is a pretty good one.  It doesn't depend on judging the quality of the work.  It doesn't depend on whether you or I feel the narrative elements clash with other stories. It only depends on assessing authorial intent.  The question, "Did the BBC or the copyright holder intend for the work to be a part of the continuity or not?" is a perfectly fair question that helps establish whether we should allow something into our articles that are written '''from an in-universe perspective'''. It works in most cases, and it certainly works in the case of DiT.   
No rule is perfect.  But this is a pretty good one.  It doesn't depend on judging the quality of the work.  It doesn't depend on whether you or I feel the narrative elements clash with other stories. It only depends on assessing authorial intent.  The question, "Did the BBC or the copyright holder intend for the work to be a part of the continuity or not?" is a perfectly fair question that helps establish whether we should allow something into our articles that are written '''from an in-universe perspective'''. It works in most cases, and it certainly works in the case of DiT.   


Line 7: Line 6:


Using our [[four little rules]] is hardly imposing some great barrier to admission. It still lets in all but <.01% of all stories ever produced or licensed by the BBC.
Using our [[four little rules]] is hardly imposing some great barrier to admission. It still lets in all but <.01% of all stories ever produced or licensed by the BBC.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130319195443-5442547/20130401030922-188432]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
231,276

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.