231,276
edits
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20190830190237/@comment-6032121-20200719102145: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-6032121-20190830190237/@comment-6032121-20200719102145 (edit)
Revision as of 23:55, 27 April 2023
, 27 April 2023Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Lots to unpack in this post, @[[User:Najawin]]. While I'm in broad agreement with you, I wish to stress that while we might ''also'' want to reconsider the specifics of Rule 1 of [[T:VS]], '''this is not in any way codependent''' with the main proposal to stop confusing "non-narrative" and "non-fiction", regardless of whether we continue to call "non-narrative" stuff invalid. | Lots to unpack in this post, @[[User:Najawin]]. While I'm in broad agreement with you, I wish to stress that while we might ''also'' want to reconsider the specifics of Rule 1 of [[T:VS]], '''this is not in any way codependent''' with the main proposal to stop confusing "non-narrative" and "non-fiction", regardless of whether we continue to call "non-narrative" stuff invalid. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
I don’t mean any insult towards any of the participants in those early conversations, but surely, in hindsight, we can all see that this isn’t exactly sensible policymaking behaviour. This isn’t a solid base on which to write the ''first'' of the ''four'' most important rules’’ of this Wiki’s validity policies! But again, that is a thread for another day.)</small> | I don’t mean any insult towards any of the participants in those early conversations, but surely, in hindsight, we can all see that this isn’t exactly sensible policymaking behaviour. This isn’t a solid base on which to write the ''first'' of the ''four'' most important rules’’ of this Wiki’s validity policies! But again, that is a thread for another day.)</small> | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20190830190237-6032121/20200719102145-6032121]]</noinclude> | ||
