User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-7302713-20130519181606/@comment-188432-20130520174032: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-7302713-20130519181606/@comment-188432-20130520174032'''
Since you've just regurgitated point after point without a breath, I'll respond in kind:
Since you've just regurgitated point after point without a breath, I'll respond in kind:
*Calling "Sarah" "Sarah Jane" has no impact upon alphabetising.   
*Calling "Sarah" "Sarah Jane" has no impact upon alphabetising.   
Line 10: Line 9:
*K9 I, K9 II (television) K9 III (prose)
*K9 I, K9 II (television) K9 III (prose)
*The only person whose name I'm thinking of hiding is the Brigadier's. And that's an exception already covered by rule. You're being hyperbolic when you say "hiding parts of some people's names but not everyone is a big confusing deal".  The rule is simply to go with the '''''one''''' name by which they are most commonly known.  That's not confusing because it's consistent.
*The only person whose name I'm thinking of hiding is the Brigadier's. And that's an exception already covered by rule. You're being hyperbolic when you say "hiding parts of some people's names but not everyone is a big confusing deal".  The rule is simply to go with the '''''one''''' name by which they are most commonly known.  That's not confusing because it's consistent.
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20130519181606-7302713/20130520174032-188432]]</noinclude>
Tech, Bots, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators
231,245

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.