Trusted
8,512
edits
Forum:Deleted Scenes and Rule 4 By Proxy: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Deleted Scenes and Rule 4 By Proxy (view source)
Revision as of 00:00, 30 April 2023
, 30 April 2023→Discussion
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 192: | Line 192: | ||
Thank you for reading. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 23:44, 22 March 2023 (UTC) | Thank you for reading. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 23:44, 22 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
[[T:VS]] as it currently stands says that deleted scenes violate R3 as well. This is a more modern invention - the original write up of T:VS didn't have the "exceptions" as violating ''any'' of the 4 rules, they were seen as independently flawed, regardless of whether they fell into the 4 rules or not. But are you saying that this current rewrite is wrong? Indeed, this is ''part of the policy'' Czech says you would have to amend in what you quote from [[Forum:P.S.]] | |||
:We'd also have to conclude that the ''actual'' title of ''[[The Claws of Axos]]'' was ''The Vampire from Space'', since there's an officially released title card on the DVD. Of even greater difficulty, we'd have to somehow have to grant the TV version of ''Shada'' some kind of legitimacy, even though major parts of it — really, most of the narrative's ''concluding'' scenes) — were never filmed at all. [...] | |||
:It would be a ''major'' sea change in the policy we currently have to allow ''storyboards'' to substitute for ''story''. | |||
Perhaps I'm misreading this part of the thread, but it seems to me that Czech is claiming that there are Rule '''''3''''' concerns in validating deleted scenes, not ''just'' Rule 4 concerns. (Obviously while this language was in its infancy.) So R4bp wouldn't move the needle one bit. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
