2,240
edits
Forum:Deleted Scenes and Rule 4 By Proxy: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Deleted Scenes and Rule 4 By Proxy (view source)
Revision as of 06:59, 30 April 2023
, 30 April 2023→Discussion
Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
| Line 213: | Line 213: | ||
::::On a more general note, Etty, what do you mean when you say "partially break R3" and the next comment about R4? I don't see how any of the other rules would impact their status on R3 - if we knew that someone absolutely, definitively intended their work to be in the DWU but it didn't pass R2, we still wouldn't consider it valid. Obviously the inverse is true as well. Authorial intent only applies to R4. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 06:06, 30 April 2023 (UTC) | ::::On a more general note, Etty, what do you mean when you say "partially break R3" and the next comment about R4? I don't see how any of the other rules would impact their status on R3 - if we knew that someone absolutely, definitively intended their work to be in the DWU but it didn't pass R2, we still wouldn't consider it valid. Obviously the inverse is true as well. Authorial intent only applies to R4. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 06:06, 30 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
I don't understand how any of these fail Rule 3 though. They all literally '''had''' an official release. And Rule 3 is specifically meant to prevent spoilers from leaks or trailers, not deleted scenes, anyway. This feels like a bizarre misreading of Rule 3 that some admins mandated that was never even written into Rule 3 afterwards! [[User:Pluto2|Pluto2]][[User talk:Pluto2|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 06:58, 30 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
