emailconfirmed, Administrators
15,041
edits
Talk:Faction Paradox: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit |
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:::I just don't agree that the two things map in the same way - it ''could'' be that metaphysical Time Lords and political Time Lords are the same set, but it categorically cannot be that Gallifreyan and Gallifreyan+ Time Lords are the same set. (With that said, I think the category tree option is probably the best we're going to get at this time.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC) | :::I just don't agree that the two things map in the same way - it ''could'' be that metaphysical Time Lords and political Time Lords are the same set, but it categorically cannot be that Gallifreyan and Gallifreyan+ Time Lords are the same set. (With that said, I think the category tree option is probably the best we're going to get at this time.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::Right. I mean that in Anastasia's usage above, "metaphysical Time Lord" seems to describe the set of Gallifreyan Time Lords, whereas "political Time Lord" describes the set of both Gallifreyan and non-Gallifreyan Time Lords. To what extent her usage reflects your intention is a different matter. Thinking of it in terms of Gallifreyan and non-Gallifreyan seems helpful to me because I don't think "metaphysical Time Lord" is a useful label for the discussion. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 20:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
