Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,395
edits
Forum:Deleted Scenes and Rule 4 By Proxy: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Deleted Scenes and Rule 4 By Proxy (view source)
Revision as of 05:10, 24 May 2023
, 24 May 2023no edit summary
m (Protected "Forum:Slot 6: Deleted Scenes and Rule 4 By Proxy" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Introduction == | {{inuse}}== Introduction == | ||
{{Quote|Oh, Davros, I am far more than just another Time Lord.|Seventh Doctor, thing he never said.}} | {{Quote|Oh, Davros, I am far more than just another Time Lord.|Seventh Doctor, thing he never said.}} | ||
Many moons ago, we codified into [[T:VS]] the concept of "Rule 4 By Proxy." The rule, relatively new compared to others, states that even when a piece of fiction's intention of being in the ''Doctor Who'' universe is dubious or disputed, having a valid source reference these events is enough to bring said piece of fiction out of the ''INVALID'' section of the website. So, for instance, [[PROSE]]: ''[[Storm in a Tikka (short story)|Storm in a Tikka]]'' is a sequel to [[TV]]: ''[[Dimensions in Time (TV story)|Dimensions in Time]]'' and a prequel to [[TV]]: ''[[Search Out Space (TV story)|Search Out Space]]'', so we now consider all three stories valid. | Many moons ago, we codified into [[T:VS]] the concept of "Rule 4 By Proxy." The rule, relatively new compared to others, states that even when a piece of fiction's intention of being in the ''Doctor Who'' universe is dubious or disputed, having a valid source reference these events is enough to bring said piece of fiction out of the ''INVALID'' section of the website. So, for instance, [[PROSE]]: ''[[Storm in a Tikka (short story)|Storm in a Tikka]]'' is a sequel to [[TV]]: ''[[Dimensions in Time (TV story)|Dimensions in Time]]'' and a prequel to [[TV]]: ''[[Search Out Space (TV story)|Search Out Space]]'', so we now consider all three stories valid. | ||
