Forum:Relaxing our fan works policy (within reason): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Added support with some criticism
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|The Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> == Proposal == This is my first thread that I've written under the temporary forums system, so it might be a little rough around the edges. I would like to preface this OP by making it clear that nothing in this thread would allow for these works to be covered as valid sources, because they '''do''' fail Rule 2. This proposal is simply about...")
 
m (Added support with some criticism)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit
Line 35: Line 35:


== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
I like this idea, and support it, but would like to emphasize that [[Devious (fan series)]] should be tagged with {{tlx|fan}} and '''not''' {{tlx|invalid}}, as the latter implies IU pages can be made about it. Also, I think having one long article on fan works might be better than creating [[fan film]]. So basically rename and expand [[fan fiction]] to [[fan work]] or something similar. Or, tbh, it could all still be at [[fan fiction]], because films ''are'' fiction. [[User:Cousin Ettolrhc|Cousin Ettolrahc]] [[User talk:Cousin Ettolrhc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
1,858

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.