939
edits
Forum:The new transmats: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
m (Minor formatting) Tag: 2017 source edit |
GabesterTGG (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
::::Colourful is not a bad thing. And I don’t know who came up with the idea that it is. Many different colours would be a good design and something the world needs. Colours that are '''BAM''' right in your face and standing out is something that is really needed. Not just on the wiki, but in general in the real world. But we can start by colourising the wiki a bit. [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:58, 28 May 2023 (UTC) | ::::Colourful is not a bad thing. And I don’t know who came up with the idea that it is. Many different colours would be a good design and something the world needs. Colours that are '''BAM''' right in your face and standing out is something that is really needed. Not just on the wiki, but in general in the real world. But we can start by colourising the wiki a bit. [[User:Danniesen|Danniesen]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:58, 28 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::: To clarify: I’m not 100% anti colour. I personally would just prefer a more restrained, bland colour palette over an ‘everything goes’ approach. But I’m sure there’s a good middle ground to be found. My bigger issue is actually the other thing I mentioned: the amount of detail and elements within each image. Some of the images within OS25’s concept are too visually dense to be effective icons, imo. [[User:TheGreatGabester|TheGreatGabester]] [[User talk:TheGreatGabester|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 05:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
