2,623
edits
Forum:The new transmats: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 184: | Line 184: | ||
:::imo the abstract nature of the design makes it seem less like a sort of rigid presentation of things that you should know about and instead, well, just a graphic that you can pay attention to or not. But, I do want to stress, I'm not wedded to the particular organization TGG has. I think this "stylized" perspective is a plus, but it's not something that's necessary in any way. To me the main points are what I listed as 1 and 2. #3 is just a bonus, and can be jettisoned without issue. If everyone wants circular icons ''like'' what OS25 has, (obviously not directly analogous) so long as 1 and 2 are met, I have no strong objection, though I'll obviously have thoughts and aesthetic preferences. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:13, 28 May 2023 (UTC) | :::imo the abstract nature of the design makes it seem less like a sort of rigid presentation of things that you should know about and instead, well, just a graphic that you can pay attention to or not. But, I do want to stress, I'm not wedded to the particular organization TGG has. I think this "stylized" perspective is a plus, but it's not something that's necessary in any way. To me the main points are what I listed as 1 and 2. #3 is just a bonus, and can be jettisoned without issue. If everyone wants circular icons ''like'' what OS25 has, (obviously not directly analogous) so long as 1 and 2 are met, I have no strong objection, though I'll obviously have thoughts and aesthetic preferences. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:13, 28 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: I myself find myself agreeing with Scrooge. Because the fact that it is very obvious that the EU parts are not needed because of the title “Down the Rabbit Hole, Alice?” In being presented as a question not a statement it is inviting you to have a look but says it it not required. To be this is glaringly obvious. The Alice in Wonderland allusion reinforces this, it is the are beyond what is commonly known. And area of strange imaginative worlds yet one which is not required to understand the main world. The Map layout at the top is more confusing to me and would confuse me even more if I was knew. It has no distinction between the easily observable and a a series which has been out of print longer than I have been alive. Whilst the other one doses distinguish quite clearly. I myself would still add a section above the other TV shows for the main show entitled something like “the core of the series” or possibly something less ambiguous I don’t know what to call it but thats my thruppence. [[User:Anastasia Cousins|Anastasia Cousins]] [[User talk:Anastasia Cousins|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC) | :::: I myself find myself agreeing with Scrooge. Because the fact that it is very obvious that the EU parts are not needed because of the title “Down the Rabbit Hole, Alice?” In being presented as a question not a statement it is inviting you to have a look but says it it not required. To be this is glaringly obvious. The Alice in Wonderland allusion reinforces this, it is the are beyond what is commonly known. And area of strange imaginative worlds yet one which is not required to understand the main world. The Map layout at the top is more confusing to me and would confuse me even more if I was knew. It has no distinction between the easily observable and a a series which has been out of print longer than I have been alive. Whilst the other one doses distinguish quite clearly. I myself would still add a section above the other TV shows for the main show entitled something like “the core of the series” or possibly something less ambiguous I don’t know what to call it but thats my thruppence. [[User:Anastasia Cousins|Anastasia Cousins]] [[User talk:Anastasia Cousins|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:09, 28 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
Further to my post on 25 May, as noted above: I like OS25's roundel vibe, and whilst I'm a fan of their suggestion, I've put a quick concept together using my own idea of simplifying - I've used promotional images, but kept it to one focus/character per roundel, with relatively plainish backgrounds. Simple, effective, recognisable. (Obviously this was tricky with Class cos it's an ensemble piece - and people may want to debate whether or not a solo image of Harkness/Barrowman is appropriate, but hey.) I've kept the colour but desaturated it a little so as not to be over-powering or too vibrant. | |||
[[File:Spinofftoprow.png|thumb]] | |||
I did have a go at making this with just the logos - it works, but it feels a bit lifeless and lacks character (heh). Anyway. Just thought I'd throw this into the discussion to accompany other debates. [[User:FractalDoctor|Fractal Doctor]] [[User talk:FractalDoctor|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
