emailconfirmed, Administrators
15,041
edits
Forum:Relaxing our fan works policy (within reason): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Relaxing our fan works policy (within reason) (edit)
Revision as of 03:20, 1 June 2023
, 1 June 2023no edit summary
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: 2017 source edit |
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
:: The main reason I don't like the practice seen at [[FanFiction.Net]] is that I think these stories deserve, at the very least, a ''blurb''. Limiting them to a list or a table is just underselling how interesting the concept is. The minimum these topic deserve is a couple sentences recapping the plot and then explaining how ''this unofficial thing'' was influential to something that was ultimately released. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 02:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC) | :: The main reason I don't like the practice seen at [[FanFiction.Net]] is that I think these stories deserve, at the very least, a ''blurb''. Limiting them to a list or a table is just underselling how interesting the concept is. The minimum these topic deserve is a couple sentences recapping the plot and then explaining how ''this unofficial thing'' was influential to something that was ultimately released. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 02:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: For sure! I mentioned [[FanFiction.Net]] above for its title, not its text, which ''definitely'' needs improvement; I wrote that page in literal seconds just because I needed something to point the redirect to, and I intend to flesh it out significantly once I get around to actually reading the stories in question. I could even imagine a section like "Notable stories" with dedicated paragraph(s) or even subsections for each one. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 03:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
