Trusted
8,511
edits
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
::Nah, we're not doing this. You don't get to refuse to have a discussion for 5 days and then remove the content as soon as the page stops being protected, saying that you're doing so because of a "warning" on the talk page. This is just a blatant rules violation. Either have the discussion you refused to have for the past five days or sod off. And to any admins who see this, might I recommend a block? The user was '''''explicitly''''' warned and refused to try to resolve this issue - instead circumventing the process by waiting for the page protection to expire. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC) | ::Nah, we're not doing this. You don't get to refuse to have a discussion for 5 days and then remove the content as soon as the page stops being protected, saying that you're doing so because of a "warning" on the talk page. This is just a blatant rules violation. Either have the discussion you refused to have for the past five days or sod off. And to any admins who see this, might I recommend a block? The user was '''''explicitly''''' warned and refused to try to resolve this issue - instead circumventing the process by waiting for the page protection to expire. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::Yeah, they've made it clear that they're just not willing to discuss this. Block them. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC) |