Talk:Season 1 (Doctor Who 2023): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 101: Line 101:
:::Yeah, they've made it clear that they're just not willing to discuss this. Block them. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
:::Yeah, they've made it clear that they're just not willing to discuss this. Block them. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
:::: "You don't get to refuse to have a discussion for 5 days and then remove the content as soon as the page stops being protected" So, what Danniesen did the first time is was protected, right? [[User:Aw21212121|Aw21212121]] [[User talk:Aw21212121|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 04:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
:::: "You don't get to refuse to have a discussion for 5 days and then remove the content as soon as the page stops being protected" So, what Danniesen did the first time is was protected, right? [[User:Aw21212121|Aw21212121]] [[User talk:Aw21212121|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 04:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
No? [[User:Danniesen]] engaged in discussion on this talk page during the time it was protected, pretty much throughout the entire time. Please, go look at the history and the talk page! It was locked from 21:24 on May 25 to 21:06 on May 26. Danniesen commented three times in that time period, once more than you, and had the last comment prior to the page being unlocked.
I'm unsure why you're so focused on [[User:Danniesen]]'s conduct here. You're violating wiki policies, full stop. Whether or not they've done so is irrelevant. Your refusal to discuss this change for five days before making a change after the protection wears off, accusing someone else of doing the same - something that just isn't true - all of this being prompted by someone else removing one of your edits originally, and you repeatedly insisting that we think that we own this page and that nobody but us can edit it? These things suggest that this is an archetypal case of [[T:POINT]] and [[T:BOUND]]. Which has been explained to you multiple times, with admins warning you. Let me even quote [[T:POINT]] here:
:If you think someone unfairly removed "unsourced" content, find a valid source for it, make the referencing clear if it was already present, or explain why the content in question shouldn't require a cited source, [do not] summarily remove from that page or other pages everything which appears to be unsourced.
This is a potentially blockable offense, and I've repeatedly tried to point out to you that you've got an issue here. Can you try to have a serious discussion about this topic without insisting over and over that someone else has aggrieved you? [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 04:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Trusted
8,512

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.