Trusted
49,551
edits
Forum:The Periodic Adventures of Señor 105: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Discussion
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:::: Also the interview that is cited on [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon I]], the [http://lifeonmagrs.blogspot.com/2013/02/guest-post-cody-quijano-schell-and.html one] from [[Life on Magrs]]... yeah ngl I do not trust the accuracy of said interview given ''it is literally being conducted by [[Panda]] and [[Fester Cat]]'', both very fictional characters. | :::: Also the interview that is cited on [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon I]], the [http://lifeonmagrs.blogspot.com/2013/02/guest-post-cody-quijano-schell-and.html one] from [[Life on Magrs]]... yeah ngl I do not trust the accuracy of said interview given ''it is literally being conducted by [[Panda]] and [[Fester Cat]]'', both very fictional characters. | ||
:::: Also from said interview, Cody says: "''But generally, 105’s universe is his universe, and hers is hers.''" Isn't this just a non-literal description? Like that of that mention of [[Henry Gordon Jago|Jago]] and [[George Litefoot|Litefoot]] being "in a universe of their own" when [[Big Finish Productions]] made the ''[[Jago & Litefoot]]'' spin-off? Plus his mention of it not being a ''Doctor Who'' spin-off... isn't that because it isn't? Something can still be set in the same universe and not be a spin-off, surely? As an author myself I do understand the issue authors have with us calling their works ''Doctor Who'' spin-offs, as it implies their notability is definable by their connection to | :::: Also from said interview, Cody says: "''But generally, 105’s universe is his universe, and hers is hers.''" Isn't this just a non-literal description? Like that of that mention of [[Henry Gordon Jago|Jago]] and [[George Litefoot|Litefoot]] being "in a universe of their own" when [[Big Finish Productions]] made the ''[[Jago & Litefoot]]'' spin-off? Plus his mention of it not being a ''Doctor Who'' spin-off... isn't that because it isn't? Something can still be set in the same universe and not be a spin-off, surely? As an author myself I do understand the issue authors have with us calling their works ''Doctor Who'' spin-offs, as it implies their notability is solely definable by their connection to ''Who''. (''Glares at [[Doctor Who spin-offs]].'') | ||
:::: I dunno, all of these pieces of evidence don't seem watertight to me, as we're inferring that they mean more then they might, to fit into our rules. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 08:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | :::: I dunno, all of these pieces of evidence don't seem watertight to me, as we're inferring that they mean more then they might, to fit into our rules. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 08:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
