Forum:A Fix with Sontarans: Fixing Fix's Validity: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:


(As for FaH potentially being invalid, that's a '''''completely''''' different line of argument and far outside the bounds of this thread. Suffice it to say that it's not because of properties of FaH and AFwS in particular. I plan on a truly massive thread going over this, so just stay tuned.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
(As for FaH potentially being invalid, that's a '''''completely''''' different line of argument and far outside the bounds of this thread. Suffice it to say that it's not because of properties of FaH and AFwS in particular. I plan on a truly massive thread going over this, so just stay tuned.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
: Retconning parts of a story so it fits into continuity... I mean, that is literally a form of continuity as {{w|Retroactive continuity|"retcon" is just short for "retroactive continuity"}}. Ignoring a previously established part of a story is just one of many forms of a retcon, but it still involves continuity; we can't pick and choose what sort of continuity is continuity enough to say something is in continuity! {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 19:59, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Trusted
49,534

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.