Trusted
49,625
edits
Forum:A Fix with Sontarans: Fixing Fix's Validity: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:A Fix with Sontarans: Fixing Fix's Validity (edit)
Revision as of 16:30, 17 July 2023
, 17 July 2023→Discussion
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
| Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
:: Whereas that precedent is more controversial in cases like the two ''Fix''es. As another example, ''[[Doctor Who and the micro:bit (TV story)|Doctor Who and the micro:bit]]'' actually has two variations - one where it's just the Doctor speaking to you and then a "live" version where two presenters are talking you through the game as they are sent the Doctor's transmissions. If we end up saying that the "live" version is not valid but the non-live version is fine, then we should have some system for making it clear was info is non-valid ''without'' needing two pages. (For the record, as far as I know both versions should likely be valid sources) [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 16:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC) | :: Whereas that precedent is more controversial in cases like the two ''Fix''es. As another example, ''[[Doctor Who and the micro:bit (TV story)|Doctor Who and the micro:bit]]'' actually has two variations - one where it's just the Doctor speaking to you and then a "live" version where two presenters are talking you through the game as they are sent the Doctor's transmissions. If we end up saying that the "live" version is not valid but the non-live version is fine, then we should have some system for making it clear was info is non-valid ''without'' needing two pages. (For the record, as far as I know both versions should likely be valid sources) [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 16:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: Hmmm. With ''Shada'', that feels like the 1992 one wasn't treated as a source, valid or not. And for ''micro:bit'', I don't think either version is more valid than one another? | |||
::: I dunno, merging the pages but having one version be invalid seems like a headache, especially for new users. | |||
::: I think it would be much simpler to just... ''validate'' 1985 ''AFwS''. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 16:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
