Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,256
edits
Forum:Charity Stories that are TECHNICALLY licensed...: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Charity Stories that are TECHNICALLY licensed... (view source)
Revision as of 15:45, 26 July 2023
, 26 July 2023no edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
::I mean, he said it ''twice'', both there and at [[Thread:125064]] at [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon I]]. I cited the other thread because I felt it summarized his point better than this one, which was a bit more all over the place. But this one is pretty close to when [[T:VS]] was written and Czech explicitly states that he's asserting his authorial intent on the meaning of [[T:VS]] on other parts of it. I'm enough of an [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/beyond-aesthetics/art-intention-and-conversation/CBCAFAC60D4EB400B8C78609868A40B3 actual intentionalist] that this is pretty persuasive to me. Does this mean we have to abide by this going forward? Of course not. But we're definitely changing things in R2 imo, unlike what the OP contends. I think the intent of [[T:VS]] is against us here. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC) | ::I mean, he said it ''twice'', both there and at [[Thread:125064]] at [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon I]]. I cited the other thread because I felt it summarized his point better than this one, which was a bit more all over the place. But this one is pretty close to when [[T:VS]] was written and Czech explicitly states that he's asserting his authorial intent on the meaning of [[T:VS]] on other parts of it. I'm enough of an [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/beyond-aesthetics/art-intention-and-conversation/CBCAFAC60D4EB400B8C78609868A40B3 actual intentionalist] that this is pretty persuasive to me. Does this mean we have to abide by this going forward? Of course not. But we're definitely changing things in R2 imo, unlike what the OP contends. I think the intent of [[T:VS]] is against us here. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::I think you can argue that this is what Czech meant in 2017 and that it thereby became standing policy at the time as a result of his ruling — but I think it was successfully left behind, and logically ceased to be policy by the time the clarification that "Rule 2 only applies to DWU concepts" was added to [[T:VS]]. Thus it's no longer standing policy now, just a bad ruling that's since been overwritten. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 15:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
