Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
Forum:Audio play, audio drama, audio story: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:::The BBC's early stuff was for radio and is variously called 'Radio dramas', but [http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/bbcworldwide/worldwidestories/pressreleases/2009/07_july/hornets_nest.shtml this Press release from the BBC Worldwide Press Office] is titled "Tom Baker returns as the Fourth Doctor in new audio dramas!" (which is for the Hornets' Nest series). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:11, May 28, 2010 (UTC) | :::The BBC's early stuff was for radio and is variously called 'Radio dramas', but [http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/bbcworldwide/worldwidestories/pressreleases/2009/07_july/hornets_nest.shtml this Press release from the BBC Worldwide Press Office] is titled "Tom Baker returns as the Fourth Doctor in new audio dramas!" (which is for the Hornets' Nest series). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:11, May 28, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::Though I will of course help with the bot to quickly make whatever change consensus suggests, I'm not particularly bothered one way or the other. They ''are'' audio plays. There's no difference between the two. I suppose where there's a ''slight'' bone of contention is that people have been putting Companion Chronicles and BBC Audio stuff into the "audio play" cats, and that's not really accurate. These are audiobooks or enhanced audio books. It might be simpler to just say "audios" and forget the play/drama/book distinction altogether. 21:10, May 28, 2010 (UTC) | |||
