Trusted
34,029
edits
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:: Well, the fact that it was the subject of a news article on the official ''Doctor Who'' website ''might'' be enough for it to have its own page under [[Forum:Relaxing_our_fan_works_policy_(within_reason)#Conclusion_2|our reworked policy on fan works]], but nothing more than that. [[User:Cgl1999|Cgl1999]] [[User talk:Cgl1999|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 06:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC) | :: Well, the fact that it was the subject of a news article on the official ''Doctor Who'' website ''might'' be enough for it to have its own page under [[Forum:Relaxing_our_fan_works_policy_(within_reason)#Conclusion_2|our reworked policy on fan works]], but nothing more than that. [[User:Cgl1999|Cgl1999]] [[User talk:Cgl1999|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 06:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: I feel I'd agree if, say, a Big Finish short trips story mentioned the events of the story. But as it stands, I don't think a news article saying "Hey this exists" is ground for even the short to have a page. Perhaps a mention on a larger page, sure. For instance, I think there was discussion of a larger article discussing fan projects discussed in DWM. Something like that. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 20:35, 18 August 2023 (UTC) |