Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,200
edits
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
: Well, in my opinion, we should presume this wasn't licensed unless further proof against this idea arises. If it turns out in 6 months that there's an interview with Seth MacFarlane calling this licensed - fine, we'll restore the page. But as it stands, with no credits and this entire thing being based on a BBC website promoting the episode... I don't believe this was licensed. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 21:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC) | : Well, in my opinion, we should presume this wasn't licensed unless further proof against this idea arises. If it turns out in 6 months that there's an interview with Seth MacFarlane calling this licensed - fine, we'll restore the page. But as it stands, with no credits and this entire thing being based on a BBC website promoting the episode... I don't believe this was licensed. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 21:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Conclusion == | |||
<div class="tech"> | |||
Right, what [[User:OttselSpy25]] said. We have no evidence that this is licensed and no particular reason to assume it should be. All it warrants for the time being is mentions at [[Cultural references to the Doctor Who universe/2010s]] and [[List of fan works in which official actors reprised their roles]]. The page itself should be made a redirect to the former, and associated pages deleted. If it transpires that it was somehow licensed after all, we'll recreate it. | |||
Whether [[Family Guy (series)]] itself should remain under the circumstances is probably a topic for [[Forum:Real world franchises with DWU connections: Qualification speedround]]. | |||
As always, thanks to everyone who participated in this thread. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 13:20, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
</div> |